sunshine_4594 shared a tip "I’m one episode into this and it’s informative. I initially jumped into it for the “Outliers” review. The main argument is that the book isn’t scientifically backed and that the author possibly misunderstands the difference between causation and correlation. It’s about an hour of debunking every chapter of a book I thought was interesting. When I first read it I didn’t actually expect anything scientific - or carefully researched for that matter, as that’s obviously not the author’s area of expertise - all that mattered to me was a good story and engaging writing and that was absolutely achieved. However, I now know the podcasters’ point of view."